See how approved work reaches payroll in Workmax. Book a Workflow Demo

Care agency decision guide

Should a care agency offer enhanced company sick pay?

Compare affordability, infection-control behaviour, recruitment value and policy complexity before choosing more than the statutory minimum.

The decision is not only about payroll cost

SSP-only policies are predictable, but a lower-paid worker may feel pressure to attend vulnerable people while unwell. Enhanced pay raises employment cost, yet can strengthen infection-control behaviour, retention and benefit positioning.

Minimum rule

Contractual sick pay can improve on SSP but cannot provide less than the statutory entitlement. Put eligibility, duration, evidence and interaction with SSP in the contract or policy.

Six policy models

ModelStrengthMain trade-offAdministration
SSP onlyLowest direct enhancement costLower-paid workers face the largest income dropSimple
Full pay for first 3 daysTargets short absences and removes immediate lossCost rises with absence frequencyModerate
Full pay for 1 week, then SSPClear, easy-to-explain benefitHigher exposure for frequent week-long absenceModerate
Service-based entitlementSupports retention and controls early-service costMore payroll rules and equality checksHigh
Enhanced infectious-illness paySupports infection-control messagesNeeds careful definitions and evidence rulesHigh
Manager discretionFlexible for exceptional casesInconsistency and discrimination risk without controlsHigh

Compare each option against the same criteria

Annual employer cost and predictability
Payroll administration
Impact on lower-paid and variable-hours workers
Risk of attending visits while unwell
Recruitment and benefit positioning
Eligibility during probation
Bank and zero-hours treatment
Long-term absence exposure
Contract and policy complexity
Interaction with phased returns

Version 1 planning examples

Illustrative annual budget ranges

Interactive modeller planned for v2

These examples are discussion ranges, not benchmarks. They assume six sickness days per carer, an illustrative average SSP cost of £24 per day, enhancement between £12 and £37.50 per day, and mixed internal/agency cover between £200 and £550 per carer annually. Replace every assumption with your own absence and cover data before budgeting.

CarersIllustrative SSPEnhancement rangeCover range
10£1,440£720–£2,250£2,000–£5,500
25£3,600£1,800–£5,625£5,000–£13,750
50£7,200£3,600–£11,250£10,000–£27,500
100£14,400£7,200–£22,500£20,000–£55,000

Policy safeguards that should not be optional

  • Record pregnancy-related sickness separately and exclude it from normal triggers.
  • Consider adjusted triggers and other reasonable adjustments for disability-related absence.
  • Use a trigger to begin a fair review, not automatic disciplinary action.
  • Do not treat probation as removing SSP entitlement.
  • Define bank and zero-hours eligibility consistently.
  • Document who can approve discretion and how consistency is checked.
  • Explain how SSP offsets enhanced pay.
  • Cover phased returns, amended duties and entitlement exhaustion.

A practical starting position

For an agency introducing enhanced pay for the first time, a short, clearly capped full-pay period followed by SSP is usually easier to model and administer than broad manager discretion. Test it against real absence frequency, cover mix and lower-paid-worker impact before changing contracts.

Reviewed 28 July 2026. Guidance sources: GOV.UK employer SSP guide, ACAS absence triggers, and ACAS disability-related absence.